Because mistakes scale faster.

Infrastructure mistakes scale with traffic. AI mistakes scale with usage and trust.

That is faster.

AI Errors Feel Plausible

AI failures are dangerous because they often look reasonable.

The output is coherent. The tone is confident. The result is wrong.

That combination spreads errors quietly.

When infrastructure fails, it fails loudly. Services return 500 errors. Dashboards turn red. Alerts fire. The failure is obvious and immediate.

When AI fails, it fails quietly. The code looks fine. The documentation reads well. The suggestion seems sensible. But the logic is subtly wrong or the approach does not fit the context.

This plausibility is the core problem. Engineers trust output that looks professional. If AI generates clean, well-formatted code, the instinct is to assume it is correct. Reviews become less thorough because the output does not trigger skepticism.

We saw this in code generation. AI would suggest an implementation that compiled and passed basic tests but had a subtle concurrency bug. The bug was not obvious in review because the code structure looked standard. It only surfaced in production under load.

We saw it in documentation too. AI would generate accurate-sounding explanations that were technically wrong. An engineer unfamiliar with the system would read the docs, trust them, and waste time debugging based on incorrect information.

The solution is not to distrust all AI output. It is to treat AI-generated content with appropriate skepticism and to verify it systematically.

Guardrails Reduce Blast Radius

Clear constraints help:

  • limit scope
  • reduce misuse
  • prevent accidental reliance
  • keep humans accountable

Without guardrails, AI becomes a silent dependency.

Guardrails define what AI can and cannot do. They create boundaries that prevent the most dangerous failure modes.

Limiting scope means AI is only used for specific, well-defined tasks. We use AI for code formatting, not for architectural decisions. We use AI for documentation drafts, not for production configuration. These boundaries make failures containable.

Reducing misuse means making it hard to use AI in ways that create risk. We prevent AI from accessing secrets. We block AI from modifying production systems directly. We require human approval for changes that AI suggests.

Preventing accidental reliance means ensuring that systems do not depend on AI being available or correct. AI is an accelerator, not a critical path. If AI services go down, engineers can still work. If AI makes a mistake, the system catches it before production.

Keeping humans accountable means that even when AI does most of the work, a human signs off on the result. Code reviews do not say “AI wrote this.” They say “I reviewed this.” Deployments are not “AI-approved.” They are “engineer-approved.”

These guardrails make AI safer to use broadly. Engineers can experiment and move quickly without creating systemic risk.

Platform Lessons Apply Again

Everything we learned from platforms applies:

  • defaults matter
  • boundaries matter
  • consistency matters
  • ownership matters

AI is not special. It is just faster.

The lessons from platform engineering transfer directly to AI governance. Platforms taught us that good defaults reduce mistakes. The same is true for AI. If the default AI prompt includes the team’s standards, output aligns with expectations.

Platforms taught us that clear boundaries prevent misuse. The same is true for AI. If AI cannot access production data, it cannot leak it. If AI cannot deploy code, it cannot create outages.

Platforms taught us that consistency reduces cognitive load. The same is true for AI. If AI always structures output the same way, engineers know what to expect and can review efficiently.

Platforms taught us that ownership matters. The same is true for AI. If a human owns every AI-generated artifact, accountability is clear. If AI operates autonomously, responsibility diffuses.

AI is not a fundamentally new challenge. It is a faster version of challenges we have solved before. Apply the same discipline, just more strictly.

Final Thought

The faster a system operates, the more guardrails it needs.

AI amplifies mistakes quickly. Good guardrails keep that amplification useful instead of dangerous.

Related reading: