Boring wins beat flashy demos.

The biggest wins from AI were not dramatic.

They were boring.

Structure and Consistency

AI helped most with:

  • consistent formatting
  • predictable layouts
  • standard language
  • repeatable patterns

Things humans are bad at doing repeatedly.

That alone improved quality.

Humans are inconsistent at boring tasks. We get tired. We forget details. We take shortcuts when deadlines loom. We apply standards differently depending on mood or urgency.

AI does not have these problems. It applies rules mechanically and consistently. If you tell it to format all documentation with the same structure, it does. Every time. Without fatigue or shortcuts.

This consistency compounds. When every README follows the same format, finding information becomes muscle memory. When every API response uses the same error structure, client code becomes simpler. When every service logs in the same format, debugging becomes faster.

We saw this most clearly in documentation. Before AI, our docs had a wide range of quality and completeness. Some were thorough. Some were sparse. Some followed the template. Some did not.

With AI, we could enforce the template automatically. Engineers would draft docs in whatever format felt natural, then ask AI to restructure them to match the standard. The AI would fill in missing sections, reorder content, and apply consistent language.

The result was not perfect documentation. But it was consistently structured documentation. And that made a bigger difference than we expected.

Review Became Easier

When output followed a known structure, reviews got simpler.

Less debate about format. More focus on substance. Fewer bikeshed conversations.

That saved real time.

Code reviews often spend too much time on style. Indentation debates. Naming discussions. Where to put the curly brace. These conversations are low value but hard to avoid when every engineer has different habits.

AI eliminated most of this friction. If AI-generated code followed the team’s style guide automatically, reviewers could skip straight to logic review. Is this algorithm correct? Does this handle edge cases? Is this the right abstraction?

Pull requests moved faster. Feedback became more substantive. Engineers spent less time defending stylistic choices and more time discussing trade-offs.

We also saw this in design docs. When every design doc followed the same structure, reviewers knew where to find specific information. The “Problem Statement” was always in the same place. “Alternatives Considered” had a predictable format. “Success Metrics” appeared in every doc.

This predictability made reviews thorough and fast. Reviewers did not have to hunt for information or ask for missing context. They could evaluate the content directly.

Documentation Improved Quietly

AI made it easier to:

  • fill in missing sections
  • standardize docs
  • keep tone consistent
  • reduce incomplete drafts

Not exciting. Very effective.

Documentation quality improved because the cost of creating good documentation dropped. Engineers no longer had to choose between shipping quickly and documenting thoroughly. They could do both.

AI helped fill gaps. If a README was missing a “How to Deploy” section, AI could generate a draft based on similar services. The engineer would review and refine it, but the starting point was no longer a blank page.

AI also helped keep docs updated. When a service changed, engineers could paste the updated code and ask AI to regenerate relevant documentation sections. This reduced the documentation drift that happens when code evolves faster than docs.

Tone consistency improved. Technical writing benefits from neutral, clear language. AI is very good at this. It does not inject personality or emotion. It states facts clearly. That uniformity makes documentation easier to read and translate.

We also saw fewer incomplete drafts. Engineers would start a doc, get pulled into something urgent, and never finish. With AI, they could generate a complete draft quickly, even if it needed refinement later. Incomplete docs became rare.

Final Thought

AI helped where discipline mattered more than creativity.

The wins were quiet. They added up.

Related reading: