Cicd

Hard-earned hindsight. If we rebuilt our pipelines today, we would not start with tools. We would start with principles. What We Would Do Differently We would: standardize earlier automate more validation avoid manual gates by default version pipelines intentionally design for change, not perfection Most importantly, we would assume growth. Standardize earlier. We let teams build custom pipelines for too long. The cost of standardization increases with every unique pipeline. If we started over, we would establish standard templates from day one. Customization would be the exception, not the norm. ...

From tooling to ownership. At first, CI/CD was just tooling. Something teams used. Something infra supported. Something no one owned end to end. Then it became critical. The Shift Happened Gradually CI/CD became part of the platform when: changes without it felt unsafe environments depended on it access flowed through it incidents traced back to it Pipelines stopped being optional. Early on, you could deploy manually if needed. SSH into a server. Copy files. Restart services. It was discouraged but possible. The pipeline was a convenience, not a requirement. ...

How small differences turn into big problems. Pipeline drift rarely starts intentionally. It starts with a small change. A special case. A temporary workaround. Then it sticks. Drift Is Hard to See Two pipelines look similar. They are not. Different flags. Different versions. Different checks. No one notices until behavior diverges. You have a standard pipeline template. Version 1.2. Most teams use it. A few are still on 1.1. One team forked it months ago and never updated. Another team copy-pasted the template and made “minor adjustments.” ...

Human approval does not scale the way you think. Manual gates sound responsible. Someone reviews. Someone approves. Nothing risky slips through. In practice, they fail quietly. Approvals Become Rituals Over time, manual approvals turn into habits. Approve because: the build looks normal nothing failed this is routine people are waiting Approval loses meaning. It becomes a checkbox. The first few times you approve a production deployment, you take it seriously. You check the changeset. You review test results. You verify that everything looks correct. You ask questions if something seems off. ...

Consistency beats flexibility at scale. Early on, we let teams build their own pipelines. It felt empowering. It felt flexible. It felt fast. It did not scale. Flexibility Creates Variance When every team builds pipelines independently: conventions diverge checks differ deployments behave differently failure modes multiply That variance is invisible at first. It becomes painful later. Team A used Azure Pipelines. Team B used GitHub Actions. Team C used Jenkins because they inherited a project that already had it. All three were valid choices. ...

Complexity always finds a way in. Our CI/CD pipeline started with a few scripts. Build the code. Run the tests. Deploy the artifact. It worked well. For a while. Then requirements accumulated. Quietly. Complexity Did Not Arrive All at Once No one decided to make the pipeline complicated. It happened incrementally: add a security scan support another environment introduce feature flags handle hotfixes add approvals support rollback Each change made sense in isolation. ...